ZX 10 R Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome ZX10R Ninja Owners!!!!!
Front Page Here
Can all new members that haven't posted please read the admin and announcement page for the forum rules.

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1  (Read 3663 times)

Jon177

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 426
  • Posts: 6410
Logged

Jon177

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 426
  • Posts: 6410
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2008, 07:59:23 PM »

Some really good vids on there from MCN. JT, Bayliss, Walker, Harris B-)
Logged

HammyUK

  • *VIP*
  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 277
  • Posts: 6591
  • You weigh how much? You bastard!
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2008, 08:09:57 PM »

Interesting. Same hard rear as all kwaks though so don't know why they dissed it for that.
Good to see that its faster than the R1 though, even in the wet
Logged
I don't need 200BHP.........................ask the guys behind me!

Andy J

  • RIP - Keiron
  • Super Moderator *VIP*
  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 600
  • Posts: 16721
  • Near Chester - NorthWales
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2008, 08:29:55 PM »

nice to see real power from the 08  :hello2:

2008 Kawasaki ZX-10R first dyno test: 170bhp at the wheel!
By MCN Road Test Desk

Bike tests

11 January 2008 11:39


MCN has just put the first 2008 Kawasaki ZX-10R on a dyno, and the new bike makes a genuine 170bhp at the rear wheel!

Torque is impressive too, making 80.24lbft at 8500rpm. To put the figure into perspective, a 2008 R1 tested back-to-back on the same dyno made 162bhp and 79.29lbft of torque at 9500rpm.
Logged

zx10r bob

  • ZX10R Staff
  • GP Hero
  • ****
  • Personal BHP 208
  • Posts: 2799
  • Northwest,,,,,Blackpool
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2008, 09:46:37 PM »

areeeeee.........those results have put a nice warm feeling in my tummie [whistle]  [whistle]

yea got to feel sorry for the r1 guys those................yea right................ [rofl] [rofl]
Logged


I Did,nt Fall of...the road came up to me and said HELLO.........now i have a new best friend called Mr E Bay..........ill be ba

GRNINJA

  • Super Dooper
  • Administrator
  • GP Hero
  • *****
  • Personal BHP 680
  • Posts: 25374
  • -ZX10R Ninja-
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2008, 10:09:44 PM »

think I'' go and get myself a cheap 07 R1  [whistle]
Logged
Ride it like you stole it - or at least try

r1ninja

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 269
  • Posts: 5070
  • Salisbury Plain
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2008, 10:21:13 PM »

Interesting. Same hard rear as all kwaks though so don't know why they dissed it for that.

Because after all these years they still can't get it right...doh!
Logged

www.r1forum.co.uk

No-one needs more than seven fifty

Jon177

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 426
  • Posts: 6410
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2008, 10:24:18 PM »

Interesting. Same hard rear as all kwaks though so don't know why they dissed it for that.

Because after all these years they still can't get it right...doh!

They are track bias bikes thats why. Andy they say the R1 needed stiffening up for track use and i know you would say the same, plus MC101 just said very similar after riding the 08 R1.

The Kwak suspension works on the newer models.
Logged

r1ninja

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 269
  • Posts: 5070
  • Salisbury Plain
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2008, 10:31:47 PM »

yeah the R1's do need stiffening up I've got an R6 spring on the rear of mine. BUT people who take their bike to the track kind of expect to make some minor mods. The majority of both bikes sold will be used on the road and most road riders expect it to work straight from the crate.
Logged

www.r1forum.co.uk

No-one needs more than seven fifty

Si-10R

  • aka 900RR
  • ZX10R Staff
  • GP Hero
  • ****
  • Personal BHP 176
  • Posts: 3410
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2008, 10:36:26 PM »

 :happy1:   [whistle]
Logged

Jon177

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 426
  • Posts: 6410
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2008, 10:41:10 PM »

yeah the R1's do need stiffening up I've got an R6 spring on the rear of mine. BUT people who take their bike to the track kind of expect to make some minor mods. The majority of both bikes sold will be used on the road and most road riders expect it to work straight from the crate.

Didnt you have yours revalved though?
Logged

r1ninja

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 269
  • Posts: 5070
  • Salisbury Plain
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2008, 10:49:31 PM »

Yeah new piston, and shimstack. Front was revalved too but uses stock springs. Tbh i only got it done because the guy offered such a good deal. Every bike would benefit form what was done to mine.

Anyway back to my original point. lol., someone here said they shouldn't have a downer on the hard rear end because Kawasakis always have done. That is correct and they have always been criticised for it, going back to the old zxr750. They either seem to get the linkage ratio wrong (zxr750J and early zxr400) , a poor rear shock design (636B1) or too much  damping (04/05 zx10)
Logged

www.r1forum.co.uk

No-one needs more than seven fifty

Jon177

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 426
  • Posts: 6410
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2008, 11:01:22 PM »

Yeah new piston, and shimstack. Front was revalved too but uses stock springs. Tbh i only got it done because the guy offered such a good deal. Every bike would benefit form what was done to mine.

Anyway back to my original point. lol., someone here said they shouldn't have a downer on the hard rear end because Kawasakis always have done. That is correct and they have always been criticised for it, going back to the old zxr750. They either seem to get the linkage ratio wrong (zxr750J and early zxr400) , a poor rear shock design (636B1) or too much  damping (04/05 zx10)

Its just character ;-)
Logged

r1ninja

  • GP Hero
  • ******
  • Personal BHP 269
  • Posts: 5070
  • Salisbury Plain
Re: MCN 2008 ZX10R Vs R1
« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2008, 11:10:41 PM »

Shame because they usually have brilliant front ends.
Logged

www.r1forum.co.uk

No-one needs more than seven fifty
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 21 queries.