Gallery > Video Gallery
2011 ZX10r Dyno comparo with BMW by Redline Motorsports
Sjyp:
Over here good dyno figures seem to be published on foras whilst bad ones seem to be forgotten about :shock: :shock: :shock:
Redlinems:
That's right, dyno numbers can be all over the place and misleading. We have seen really no difference between gen 1 and gen 2 engines and we've run enough of them to know. Gen 3 is when the difference came. It so easy to manipulate the numbers that it's done all the time for one reason or another. Some dyno's just read higher, ours is a little stingy but that is why results off of the same dyno are so important. It's not the total power that counts, it's the spread and where it happens.
kit-parts:
And how it makes it....
ZX10R-RACER:
Cant be arsed reading all the post but.....
kawasaki`s figures are 209.9 bhp with ram air and 200 ish without
i have seen myself a stock zx10 2011 make 200 on a dyno (crank figures)
most d6/7`s make over 170 ..i`v dyno`d these my self and first gen`s slightly less on average but only talk 2-3 bhp
r1ninja:
Here's what Tim Radley of Race Deevolpments has to say about Rolling Road Dynos
--- Quote ---Many people have the dynojet and just do inertia tests. This is why they can see up to 15bhp variation on a superbike just changing a rear wheel/rubber combo. Its to do with the bhp calculations having to make an inertia assumption which if you vary either side of this mass it skews the numbers.
--- End quote ---
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version